The load generation agents getting placed on different geographies is a very good feature of the solution. "Simple capturing of dynamic variables and simple scripting." "We appreciate that this solution is very user-friendly, even if the user does not have a lot of protocol knowledge and experience." "My company has a good experience with Tricentis NeoLoad, and what I like best about it is that it lets you generate loads from different geographies.
NEOLOAD VS LOADRUNNER VS JMETER PROFESSIONAL
More Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional Pros →
It provides a lot of powerful features to do that very efficiently and effectively." "A very comprehensive tool that is good for performance testing." With LoadRunner, you can spawn 2000 contributions for one machine." "The most valuable feature is the ability to create performance test cases quickly and then execute them. The best feature with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is that there is very little bottleneck or overhead issues. They're coming up with new features which are good." "It is an advanced tool with multiple options available for the performance system." "Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten." "The most valuable features of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional are scripting and executing the tests." "I would rate Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional's stability at eight out of ten." "It has features for recording. Recently, they have released different versions, such as the professional and enterprise. "The most valuable features of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional are the separate module for scripting, execution analysis, and integration with a lot of new things pipeline areas. They also related that testing could be a bit buggy at times, which adds to the solution being less desirable. Users consistently feel Tricentis NeoLoad should support more protocols to be more competitive with other solutions. The solution is continually updating to ensure users get the best possible experience possible every time. Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional supports numerous protocols and applications and is very user-friendly. Service and Support: Users of both solutions feel the service and support are good.Ĭomparison Results: When selecting a Performance Testing Solution for an organization, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional finishes ahead of Tricentis NeoLoad.Pricing: Users of both solutions say both solutions are expensive.Currently, the integration process is complex and time-consuming. Users recommend improving its integration with third-party tools. A user favorite feature is the ability to generate loads from different geographies easily. Tricentis NeoLoad offers seamless capturing of scripting and dynamic variables. Many users feel better integration with open-source platforms would be beneficial. it offers very high performance and stability.
Users are able to create performance test cases very quickly and immediately execute them seamlessly. Features: Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional provides a very intuitive graph monitoring feature.Ease of Deployment: Users of both solutions say they are easy and straightforward to deploy.After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. We performed a comparison between Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and Tricentis NeoLoad based on our users’ reviews in four categories.
0 kommentar(er)
